Kodak Snapic vs Nana Camera: Real-World Wedding Shoot Results (Melbourne)
Share
A Real-World Wedding Photo Test in Melbourne
Earlier this year, I tested both the Kodak Snapic and the Nana Camera at a real wedding celebration in Melbourne. Instead of lab tests, this was a practical, fast-paced environment—changing light, candid moments, and no second takes.
Below are sample images from both cameras shot on Fujifilm 200 ISO film, developed and scanned at FilmNeverDie Melbourne. Judge the results for yourself.


Above: two wedding photos from the Kodak Snapic


Above: two wedding photos from the Nana Camera

Above: Kodak Snapic with close-up mode

Above: Nana Camera with close-up lens

Above: Kodak Snapic

Above: Nana Camera

Above: Kodak Snapic with close-up mode

Above: Nana Camera with close-up lens

Above: Kodak Snapic with flash

Above: Nana Camera with flash

Above: handheld self/group shot on Kodak Snapic with close-up mode

Above: handheld self/group shot on Nana Camera with close-up lens

Above: Kodak Snapic with flash

Above: Nana Camera with flash

Above: Kodak Snapic with flash

Above: Nana Camera with flash
Why This Test Matters (Melbourne Film Photography Context)
If you're shooting film photography in Melbourne—especially for weddings, parties, or street photography—you need a point-and-shoot film camera that is lightweight, nimble, and capable of handling real-world situations like mixed lighting, fast candid moments, and varying focus distances. This comparison focuses exactly on that: cameras that deliver consistent results without overthinking.
Specs Overview
Kodak Snapic 35mm Point & Shoot Film Camera
Technical Specifications
📸 General
- Film Format: 35mm (36 × 24 mm)
- Film Transport: Auto loading & advance
- Film Rewind: Auto or manual (force rewind)
- Multiple Exposure: Yes (max. 2 exposures)
🔍 Lens & Focus
- Lens: 25mm, 3-element glass lens
- Maximum Aperture: f/9.5
- Focusing: Manual 2-zone focus (0.5m – 1.5m / 1.5m – ∞)
⚡ Shutter & Flash
- Shutter Speed: 1/100s
- Built-in Flash: Yes (Guide No. ~8, ISO 100 at 2.5m)
- Flash Modes: On / Off / Auto
- Red-Eye Reduction: Yes
🔋 Power
- Battery Type: 2 × AAA alkaline batteries
- Battery Life: Approx. 10 rolls (24 exposures each)
📏 Build & Dimensions
- Dimensions: 118 × 62 × 35 mm
- Weight: 117g
- Materials: ABS plastic
Nana Camera 35mm Point & Shoot Film Camera
Technical Specifications
📸 General
- Film Format: 35mm / 135 (24 × 36 mm)
- Film Advance: Motorized wind (on/off)
🔍 Lens & Focus
- Lens: 31mm f/11 aspherical coated lens
- Standard Focus: Fixed focus (2m – ∞)
- Close-Up Mode: Focus at 1m (with close-up lens)
- Wide Angle Mode: ~24mm (with attachment)
- Fisheye Mode: ~14mm (with attachment)
⚡ Shutter & Flash
- Shutter Speed: 1/125s
- Flash: Built-in with slide switch
- Flash Recycle Time: ~15 seconds
- Red-Eye Reduction: LED system
🔋 Power
- Battery Type: AA batteries
📏 Build & Dimensions
- Dimensions: 110 × 62 × 38 mm
- Weight: 300g (with film)
- Body: Metal front casing
Big Takeaways: Kodak Snapic vs Nana Camera
The biggest highlight of the Kodak Snapic is its 3-element glass lens, giving it an edge in sharpness and overall rendering. It also features a built-in close-up function, making it quick and convenient for portraits, along with a useful double exposure feature.
The Nana Camera, developed by FilmNeverDie, takes a different approach. It features a metal body and a coated aspherical lens designed for character and flexibility. Both cameras use coated optics to better manage light and reduce aberrations.
Close-Up & Creative Flexibility
This is where the two cameras really differ.
The Kodak Snapic has a built-in close-up mode, which is fast and convenient—great for weddings when moments happen quickly.
The Nana Camera features a 30mm filter thread, opening up a full creative system:
- Close-up lenses
- Fisheye attachments
- Wide-angle adapters
In real use, the Nana produces slightly sharper close-up portraits at around 1 metre, with more pleasing bokeh.
Battery & Real-World Usability
Both cameras sit around f/9 (despite the Nana being labelled f/11), making them easy to use in daylight and flash scenarios.
- Kodak Snapic → 2× AAA batteries, slimmer body
- Nana Camera → 1× AA battery, but higher power consumption
From real-world use at a Melbourne wedding, the Nana typically needs a battery change every 1–2 rolls when using flash frequently. Flash output on the Nana appears slightly stronger than the Kodak Snapic.
In Summary
Kodak Snapic:
- Wider field of view
- Sharper edges
- Cleaner overall rendering
Nana Camera:
- Sharper close-up at 1m with nicer bokeh
- Slightly stronger flash
- Strong creative flexibility with attachments
Final thoughts: the Kodak Snapic is slim, reliable, and practical. The Nana Camera feels more premium with its metal body and shines in creative flexibility. As always, it comes down to trade-offs and shooting style.
Which would you choose? Have you tried either camera for film photography in Melbourne or at a wedding? Drop a comment on our Instagram or send us an email—we'd love to hear from you.